Why is evolution such a big hoax?
If evolution took place, then why has mankind gone from writing upon stones to laser printers in just the past 3,500 years?
So why is it that mankind has only discovered better inventions in the past few thousand years?
If we evolved, as evolutionists claim, then why didn't man discover ink a thousand years ago?
There were NO planes, cars, computers, refrigerators, electricity, lights, gas, powered-equipment, telephones, recording devices, CD players, MP3 players, other modern technological inventions--just a mere 170 years ago.
This is just another undeniable PROOF that evolution is a lie. If mankind had evolved, then men would have discovered these inventions a very long time ago
It's amazing to me how people continually place God and the Bible on trial; yet unquestioningly accept the teaching of evolution by some teacher or "scientists". This just shows their wicked heart of unbelief in the Word of God
I take the Word of God anyday!!
If we evolved at least 10000 years ago, we would have invented all those things a long time ago but we didn't! Only a few hundred years! Because we NEVER evolved!!
to sum ‘it’ all up, dude, because of the SIN part and escapism of Accountabilities! period.
that is technological evolution. the theory of evolution is BIOLOGY, with a B. there is no changing gene frequencies in a computer chip. that is the exponential nature of technological growth. ray kurtzwiel has a good explanation of this. you use one paradigm to invent the next so it accelerates. it took 50 years for telephones to be adopted but only 10 for instant messenger. you are a moron
It’s rather obvious that you have not the faintest clue about the very
foundations of evolution.
Stick with your God and be happy. He will give you all the answers
you will ever need.
See what fundamentalism does?
See, you know evolution is real. You are just denying it.
you honestly think that’s a valid point don’t you? please be a troll, please be a troll.
You really do sound like an idiot right now…
All of those innovations you mentioned took TIME to make and think about. We are only human beings, we can only do so much, we can’t travel the stars yet, so are you saying we are primitive still? AS time progresses we learn new things, and those minds that look to find new answers to things instead of the usual, "God did it" actually get somewhere.
child
I’m Dilbert.
Why can’t you argue evolution on its merits? Why do you have to make up definitions and lie about what evolution-the change in the relative frequency of alleles in a population over time-means?
I mean, seriously, is your god and your side so small and weak lies and misrepresentation is all you have?
Most Christians, most theists, have no problem with evolution. It seems you just don’t even know what evolution is.
Quran have several Scientific Miraculous.
Big Bang:
"A new start forming out of a cloud of gas and dust (nebula), which is one of the remnants of the "SMOKE" THAT WAS THE ORIGIN OF THE WHOLE UNIVERSE" [The Space Atlas, Hearther and Hencest, page 50]
1500 years Ago Allah Almighty says this in Holy Quran:
"Then He(God) turned to the Heaven when it was SMOKE…" [Quran, 41:11]
Only Islam claims that the universe was originated from Dust, and Hot Gas, or Smoke!
Its really interesting to know that the Big Bang Theory suggest that the Universe is still expanding until today, because this is EXACTLY what Allah Almighty also claimed in Holy Quran:
"And the firmament, We constructed with power and skill and and verily WE ARE EXPANDING IT" [Quran, 51:47]
The word "Samaa" was used for "firmament". "Samma" as I mentioned above means either "heaven", or "Universe" depending on how it is used. Certainly, the meaning word "Samma" in Quran 51:47 is "Universe"
So here its mentioned about the Universe.
Note: In Quran God referred Himself as "We" its plural royality.
See >> "verily WE ARE EXPANDING IT(Universe)" [Quran, 51:47]
According to Big Bang Theory and Modern Science the Universe still Expanding! Allah Almighty says it 1500 years ago in Holy Quran!
An important point:
God Almighty says in Quran: "And when the heaven splitteth asunder and becometh ROSY LIKE PAINT" [Quran, 55:37]
The explosion of galaxies are shaped like roses mentioned in Quran and confirmed by modern Science! See the several photo from NASA what showing "Rose-shape" galaxies! Please click this link to see those picture http://www.answering-christianity.com/galaxy_explosion.htm
More proof about Rose-Shape Galaxies Please click this link http://www.answering-christianity.com/paint_in_space_miracle.htm
"It is HE who created the Night and the Day, and the sun and the moon: all (the celestial bodies) rotate, each other in their celestial spheres" [Quran 21:33 from Yushuf Ali]
"(God is) the one who created the night, the day, the sun and the moon. Each one is traveling in an orbit with its own motion" [Quran, 21:33]
"And the earth, moreover, hath He made egg shaped" [Quran, 79:30]
This verse in Arabic "Waal-arda baAAda thalika Dahaha" [Quran, 79:30]
Here Arabic word "Dahaha" is derived from "Dahhyah" which means "Egg"
The Arabic word for egg here is dahaha which mean an ostrich-egg. The shape of an ostrich-egg resembles the geo-spherical shape of earth.
Thus the Quran correctly describes the shape of the earth, though the prevalent nation when the Quran was written revealed was that the earth flat. So Quran is truth.
Quran says Moonlight is reflected Light:
Science now tell us that the Light of the moon is reflected light. However this fact was mentioned 1500 years ago in Quran!
"Blessed is He Who made Constellations the skies, and placed therein a Lamp and a Moon giving Light." [Quran, 25:61]
"See ye not how Allah has created the seven heavens one above another, And made the moon a light in their midst, and made the sun as a Glorious Lamp?" [Quran, 71:15-16]
"Did you see how Allah created seven heavens, and and above the other, and made in them the moon a light and the sun a Lamp?" [Quran, 78:12-13]
The Quran distinguishes between them by the use of different terms: Light (Noor) for the Moon, and Lamp (Siraaj) for the Sun.
"It is He who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon be a light (of beauty)." [Quran, 10:5]
Why Quran not says moon also a shining glory unto sun? The verse have clear difference between sun and moon lights.
Now we know moon have no lights and its the reflected light from sun. Quran says same 1500 years ago.
"Do the unbelievers not realize that the heavens and the earth were Joined together, then I clove them asunder and I MADE EVERY LIVING THING OUT OF WATER" [Quran, 21:30]
This is a dramatic affirmation of the modern idea that the origin of life is aquate. Now we know Cytoplasm 90% is water.
human evolution is where the conflict began.
Scientists have tried everythng from monkey to cave men still a mystery.another theory say cave men mate with modern men.all abrahamic script say tht modern men came from adam.
Still scietist cant say anythng beyond big bang .they gv singularity theory.so why GOD cant be always there if you follow singularity theory
Writing on stones to laser printing is less of a leap than no language to language was.
Inventions are less of a leap than getting the idea to use objects as tools was.
Finding new uses for electricity is much less significant than getting the idea to use the forces of nature to do work for you was.
We made the biggest, most significant leaps long before technology started.
If God created humans, why didn’t he create them with the knowledge necessary to use those tools? Surely life would have been better for the ancient Hebrews if they had advanced medicine, better weapons, and knowledge of ways to grow food in a drought. Why wouldn’t God have given his chosen people that knowledge?
Didn’t we start defining and using the scientific method around that time? I’m seeing a connection here.
EDIT: Okay, I’ll bite. Why haven’t we flown to Pluto and invented time machines by now? If we evolved so long ago, shouldn’t we already know everything about everything and done everything possible?
*gasp!* You’re right! We’re not magic, so evolution must never have happened!
I suppose there’s some point you’re trying to make here, but frankly, I don’t see it. Technological advances have little to nothing to do with evolution (other than mankind being able to increasingly control his environment may modify his evolution, since evolution usually is a reaction to the environment.)
What the hell does any of that have to do with evolution?
You are right. That is proof. you have a hard time with the concept of proof. What will you be doing for your 16th Birthday?
Here’s an example why you sound stupid.
Can you know how to subtract if you can’t count? No, you have to learn to count before you can subtract. And you are saying this: people should have known how to build a computer when there was no electricity, people should have known how to make a 12 story building when all they knew how to build with was wood, people should have known how to make ice before they knew how to freeze it. Thus disproving your argument.
OMG another fundie with Sh#t for brains. ROTFLMAO
Technological innovation has absolutely nothing to do with evolution. You would understand that, if you had ever paid attention to history, anthropology, biology or the various other sciences that most 6th graders have a basic understanding of. Perhaps being home-schooled and learning ‘facts’ in bible school have slowly eroded your intelligence, and if that’s the case we’re all sorry for you and we realize that it’s not your fault. Good luck!
Good brains that work at problems instead of thinking that a god can take care of it . Wow after reading your whole question i think you need to check in to the nearest psyche ward and get some needed counseling for your delusion and hurry before the fanatic in you pops up .
Why aren’t we so advanced by now you ask?
Evolution isn’t the explanation, religion is.
Bla bla bla, more rants from some ignorant and astoundingly stupid nincompoop. Are you foaming at the mouth yet???
THE GREATEST DISCOVERIES OF SCIENCE IN THE PAST 170 YEARS WAS NOT REAL DISCOVERIES . THE TECHNOLOGY OF MODERN DAY IS THE WORK OF INTELLIGENT LIFE FROM ANOTHER GALAXY .
Please read the following completely…
There is no such thing as "The Theory of Evolution." There isn’t now and there never has been. There are, however, theories that try to explain biological evolution…
Biological evolution is a conclusion based on FACTS. An individual fact of biological evolution is a single fossil or other artifact recovered, studied and reported in detail. There are over 100,000,000 "facts" of biological evolution. It is a fact that in the recent past (60 million years ago) there were no large mammals at all such as horses, bears, man, etc. Farther back it is a fact that there were no flowering plants of any kind. Still farther back it is a fact that there was no life on land- at all. Still farther back the fossils reveal that there were no fishes in the oceans. Still farther back it is a fact that there was no multicellular life on Earth, anywhere. These are a very few of the many, many facts that make biological evolution on Earth a fact.
The facts show unmistakably that life in the past was different from life today. The facts show unmistakably that life has changed (evolved) over time. Biological evolution is a FACT, not a theory. The question is: how can these facts from the fossil record be explained? How did biological evolution happen?
The theory of "Decent With Modification" (first proposed by Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace - since improved) is the theory that currently best explains the mountain of FACTS showing that biological evolution happened. Without the theory of Decent With Modification the FACTS of biological evolution would still be there begging for an explanation. If a theory is proposed in the future that better explains the facts of biological evolution, we will discard the Darwin/Wallace theory as we have discarded Aristotle’s "Great Chain of Being" theory and the Bible’s “Creation Theory.” They were discarded because they couldn’t explain the FACTS.
Natural Selection is not a theory but is a proposed mechanism to explain how the theory of Decent With Modification would proceed. The theory of Decent With Modification does NOT need Natural Selection for the theory to be valid. If a better mechanism is found we will relegate that mechanism to the scrap heap as we have past mechanisms such as Lamarck’s “Inheritance of Acquired Traits”…
“Survival Of The Fittest” is nothing but a catch phrase that is not even accurate. A more accurate representation of that poorly worded concept would be “Differential Reproduction.” That is, the favored survival of individuals and their progeny who posses variations that can better utilize the environment they currently live in.
There is no such thing as “Darwinism” any more than there is “Newtonism” or “Einsteinim.”
There is a general misunderstanding about just what constitutes a “theory.” The word "theory" has several meanings. The common meaning used by the general public is that of a "guess" or "opinion." You could say, "It is my theory that the CIA ordered Kennedy’s assassination." or "It is my guess/opinion that the CIA ordered Kennedy’s assassination. A scientific theory, however, is not a guess or opinion as the word “theory” is used by the general public.
A scientific “theory” is an overall unifying principal that seeks to explain seemingly disconnected observations (facts) under a single, simple concept. As such, a theory is the highest form of knowledge about the universe because it explains not just one isolated part of the natural world but it ties together many observations (facts), that may not seem to be connected, under a single unifying principle.
Facts, on the other hand, are single pieces of information about the world that usually come from controlled experiments. Lots and lots of facts are usually unified and explained by a single theory.
You can collect facts (measurements) about the motions of the planets. You can collect facts about the movement of projectiles and falling bodies. You can study the flow of rivers. The Theory of Gravity explains all of these observations and measurements. Without the Theory of Gravity the FACTS of the movements of objects remain and beg to be explained…
That’s just sad, dude. Incredibly sad.
If you can use the tools of enlightenment to stay in the dark, I feel sorry for you…which makes it difficult to debate you with conviction.
Normally, I would just ignore your question, but on the tiniest bits of hope that you might understand my POV, I will post my reaction to your post. (Not "agree with me" just understand where people like me come from)
Technology is the direct result of basic scientific research. Basic scientific research has made massive advances over the last 300 years as a direct result of several strategic changes in how it thinks about the search for truth.
(1) The first and most important of these changes was the Age of Enlightenment in the 18th century. Primary change: reason is the primary source for legitimacy and authority. What did reason REPLACE? Religion and interpretation of Biblical truth.
(2) The second important change was the industrial revolution in the 19th century. Primary change related to science: alternative sources of (big) money for research, devolopment, & practical applications. What did it replace: Government and Church, both heavily influenced by religious and non-commercial interests.
(3) In the 20th century, complete separation of Church & state from commercial interests in the American form of economics and a smashing of Church in the European form of economics in Western Europe as well as in Japanese and other Asian forms.
You see this, I assume, as evidence that evil ("wicked hearts") is winning. I see this as evidence that God is dead.
Six of one, half dozen of another.
Don’t be silly! It takes a great deal of underlying science and technology to produce some of the inventions you name, and the process of discovery generally is driven by need, and dependent on understanding. Needs addressed by simpler inventions don’t tend to drive further innovation until the advantages of those simpler inventions are inadequate to meet new conditions. Understanding develops slowly.
Archaeological evidence suggests that people with minds like ours have only appeared very recently–in the last 35,000 years. Before that, our progenitors lacked any culture we might recognize (probably because they lacked the sort of languages we have). Agricultural development can be traced back only 10,000 years; writing, only 6,000. (And yes, that means that ink has been around for a few thousand years, contrary to your notions. Haven’t you heard of the Dead Sea Scrolls?)
We are a very new race, and we have gone from primitive hunter-gatherers to users and makers of all these inventions in a short time precisely because we have recently developed the ability to formulate and communicate complex ideas. Your notions of the time required seem to ignore the amount of fundamental knowledge underlying complex modern inventions, and to miss the fact that only a few thousand years–a very tiny fraction of the billions-year-old history of life forms on this planet–have involved creatures (meaning us) with the ability to communicate via language.
Oh, and I don’t see any of this as placing God or the Bible on trial; I’m a Christian. But I’m not a Biblical literalist (and I think there’s good evidence in the Bible that its authors weren’t, either). And I’m also not the sort who ignores the overwhelming evidence for evolution because his mind is made up already.
What I can’t really understand is how any Christian can claim to worship God and at the same time demand that God restrict His methods of creation to those that particular Christian is able to imagine. That seems to me disrespectful, if not contemptuous, of the Creator.
Hell the Chinese invented paper and ink 2000 years ago (Paper was invented by Cai Lun in 105 AD). Were you asleep in ancient history class?
Short Answer: we discovered oil 150 years ago. Oil led to all the modern products and technologies we enjoy today, Most of which have come about in the previous century,
Besides, ancient Arabic, Greek, Chinese and other civilizations had mastered mathmatics, mechanics and archetecture. We just didn’t have modern conveniences like cable TV, satellites and cell phones.
Your argument is based entirely on Reductio ad Absurdum.