<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value for an older record/8-track (?antique)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiquerecordplayers.info/value-for-an-older-record8-track-antique.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiquerecordplayers.info/value-for-an-older-record8-track-antique.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles C</title>
		<link>http://antiquerecordplayers.info/value-for-an-older-record8-track-antique.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7253</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiquerecordplayers.info/value-for-an-older-record8-track-antique.htm#comment-7253</guid>
		<description>The cabinet, if well made is worth more than the equipment.m You need to give more info for a better estimate.
The brand, model and year would be good. There should be a label of some sort. But console systems as you describe were usually of poor quality. Antique it is not. An 8 track console system would have been made from the mid to late 1970's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cabinet, if well made is worth more than the equipment.m You need to give more info for a better estimate.<br />
The brand, model and year would be good. There should be a label of some sort. But console systems as you describe were usually of poor quality. Antique it is not. An 8 track console system would have been made from the mid to late 1970&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

