<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best record player to get?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiquerecordplayers.info/best-record-player-to-get.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiquerecordplayers.info/best-record-player-to-get.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 04:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://antiquerecordplayers.info/best-record-player-to-get.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5341</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiquerecordplayers.info/best-record-player-to-get.htm#comment-5341</guid>
		<description>Probably the Audio Technica AT PL60...a lot of the quality has to do with the cartridge you use...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the Audio Technica AT PL60&#8230;a lot of the quality has to do with the cartridge you use&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

